The Standard Operating Procedures is the official document that sets out the rules and format of the Schools' Competition.
The debating season is conducted during Terms 2 and 3.
Debates take place on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday evenings as specified on the Calendar of Events.
All divisions except Senior and Open have 5 preliminary rounds. Senior and Open have 4 preliminary rounds.
Each team attends the same designated venue for the preliminary rounds.
First debates begin at 6:40pm. Debaters should arrive 10 minutes before the scheduled time of their debate.
Short Preparation debaters are required to arrive 90 minutes before their scheduled debate to receive the topic.
Senior: Students in Years 11 and 12
Open: Students of any age. Adults may participate in this division provided that they register through a school.
There are two teams in a debate: an Affirmative Team and a Negative Team.
The Affirmative Team agrees with the topic.
The Negative Team disagrees with the topic.
Each team has three speakers.
The speaking order of speakers is as follows: First Affirmative, First Negative, Second Affirmative, Second Negative, Third Affirmative, Third Negative.
Each speaker speaks for a set time (see Topics) with a warning bell one minute before the set speaking time has elapsed.
Times for speakers are determined by division level.
The winner of each debate is decided by an adjudicator.
Adjudicators will deliver a brief summary and constructive criticism at the end of a debate.
The Adjudicator’s decision is final.
A debate is set up as shown in the diagram below.
The Affirmative Team will provide the Chairman for a debate.
The Negative Team will provide the Timekeeper for a debate.
The Chairman will introduce the debate and speakers according to the Chairman’s sheet. They are also responsible for reading the Chairman's Notices at the end of the Third Negative speaker's speech.
The Chairman is responsible for obtaining forms for a debate from the Information Desk and filling them out ready for the adjudicator. They must also collect a speaker award and the Chairman's Notices.
The Timekeeper is responsible for ensuring that a bell and stopwatch is collected from the Information Desk if one is not already available in a debating room.
The Timekeeper will keep a record of the speaking times and record these times on the timekeeper’s sheet which should be handed to the adjudicator at the conclusion of the last speaker’s speech.
The Chairman or Timekeeper will ring a warning bell once, one minute before the end of a speaker’s speaking time and twice at the allocated finishing time. If a speaker speaks for more than 30 seconds after the second bell, the Chairman or Timekeeper should ring a continuous bell indicating that the speaker must immediately finish and sit down.
In the event that there are not two people available to assume the roles of Chairman and Timekeeper, one person may perform both roles.
Both the Chairman and Timekeeper will act in a professional and impartial manner throughout the debate
Each speaker receives a score out of 100. The score will range from 70 to 100.
Marks are alloted to speakers on the basis of:
A team score is the average of the three speakers’ scores. The team with the highest team score at the conclusion of the debate is declared the winner.
Primary School students are not permitted to view the score sheet with individual scores at the end of the debate, but may ask the adjudicator for their team score.
An Official Team is one which consists of 3 members who:
are students of the school for which they are competing and;
are in the designated Year level or lower.
An Open division team need only have 3 members to be an Official Team.
During finals, an Official Team must also consist of members who have debated for that team at least once during the preliminary rounds.
An Unofficial Team is one which does not satisfy the definition of an Official Team given above.
An Official Debate is one in which both teams are Official Teams.
An Unofficial Debate is one in which one or both teams are Unofficial Teams. In such a debate the Official Team, if one exists, is declared the winner by default.
If a team debates one or two persons short, a member of that team may speak more than once. If that member is an official team member, then s/he will be counted as an Official team member for one speech only.
In an unofficial team, team members receive a minimum of 70 speaker points each. The official members of that team may receive up to a maximum of 85 speaker points.
The adjudicator is responsible for handing the results sheet to the Committee Desk at the conclusion of the evening.
Results will be posted on the website by the Monday following a debate.
Teams will be ranked first according to win/loss points, then by aggregate team scores.
Teams will receive win/loss points according to the following:
Official Team win: 4 points
Official Team loss
- against Official Team 3 points
- against Unofficial Team 4 points
Unofficial Team win 2 points
Unofficial Team loss 1 point
Forfeit 0 points
If a team arrives at a debate where there is no opposition due to a forfeit or otherwise, that team shall have the option of:
Not debating at all. The team will be awarded a win by default and each speaker will receive 85 points each; or
Debating against another team without an opposition. Both teams will be awarded a win by default. Speakers of both teams will receive no less than 85 points each; or
Debating against the adjudicator. The adjudicator will give the team feedback and present possible opposing arguments. The team will be awarded a win by default. Speakers will receive no less than 85 points each.
10. Prepared Debates
A Prepared or Standard Debate is one for which the topic is known to teams before the scheduled debate.
All divisions have Prepared Debates.
A Short Preparation Debate is a debate in which teams are given the topic 90 minutes before the scheduled debate.
The Year 10, Senior and Open divisions all have Short Preparation Debates.
A maximum of 5 team members can participate in the preparation.
An adult can help with short preparation for Year 10.
Senior and Open division teams must prepare Short Preparation debates without adult help or supervision.
To preserve the integrity of the preparation process, students are not permitted to communicate with non-team members during the preparation time.
Quodlibetical Debates are debates where the topic is in the form of a scenario, which often presents debaters with a moral dilemma. Debaters should debate the issues presented by the scenario.
Quodlibetical topics may feature as Short Preparation Debates and are used at the Year 10, Senior and Open divisions.
13. One Card Debates
One Card Debates are held for Year 9, Year 10 and Senior divisions.
A One Card Debate is a prepared debate in which each debater may only use one card. The aim of this format is to encourage debaters to speak more from “dot point” notes rather than to write out their entire speech.
The card must be no larger than a standard index card (3 inches x 5 inches).
Small or cramped writing is not to be used. A minimum of 10 point type or handwriting equivalent to be used.
Speeches should not be memorised.
Only one side of the card may be used for the prepared speech. The other blank side may be used for rebuttal. No additional rebuttal cards are permitted.
The Adjudicator will ask for the card to be shown before the debate begins.
Speaking times for One Card debates are as for Prepared Debates.
The draw for Rounds 1 to 5 will be distributed to schools before the end of Term 1.
There may be minor changes to the draw as a result of forfeits or postponements. In such an event the coaches of all affected teams will be notified by email, or fax where no email address is available.
The current draw is available from the Debating SA website.
15. Late Teams
Teams should aim to arrive to a debate at least 10 minutes before the scheduled debate time.
If a team or team members are running late, Debating SA should be contacted on 0406 982 012.
If all the members of a team have not arrived 15 minutes after the scheduled debate time, that team:
may debate as an unofficial team, if one or more team members have arrived, or;
will forfeit the debate incurring a forfeit without notice charge.
If a team prepares the wrong side of the topic, that team will have 20 minutes after the scheduled debate time to prepare the correct side.
If the team is not willing to debate after 20 minutes that team will have forfeited the debate.
A team forfeits when it does not debate at all in a given round. Forfeits should be avoided at all costs. Postponements and Unofficial Debates are alternatives to forfeits.
In the event that a team wishes to forfeit:
The Debating Coordinator of the opposing school should be notified. Please note that the opposing team may still choose to attend the debate as scheduled as described in Section 9.
A $30 forfeit charge will be charged to the forfeiting school if it forfeits by 5pm on the day BEFORE the debate. This charge is increased to $50 otherwise (e.g. late forfeit or no notice). A finals forfeit will incur a forfeit charge of $75.
Debates may only be postponed if all of the following are satisfied:
The debate to be postponed is in Rounds 1 to 4. If the debate is a Round 5 debate, it may only be brought forward.
The opposing school agrees to the postponement.
An adjudicator is available to adjudicate the postponed debate.
If the opposing school refuses the postponement, the postponing team will have forfeited automatically. The opposing school may participate in a debate without opposition if it chooses to. The school which attempted the postponement will not be charged a forfeit fee.
The postponing school is responsible for contacting the opposing school to organise a suitable postponement date and time. In the first instance, it is preferable to hold the postponed debate on another scheduled debating date at a scheduled debating venue. If this is not possible, the two schools should negotiate a suitable date.
The responsibility of hosting the postponed debate lies with the school wishing to postpone, however, the opposing school is welcome to host if it is more convenient to them.
The date and venue of the postponement should be conveyed to Debating SA by the website at www.debatingsa.com.au/login OR via the Postponement Form OR by email. Debating SA will notify both schools if an adjudicator is available.
If the postponed debate is held outside of scheduled debating nights then the postponing school will be charged $25 for the services of the adjudicator.
19. Finals Series
There will be a Finals Series for the Year 8, Year 9, Year 10, Senior and Open divisions, consisting of Quarter Finals, Semi Finals and a Grand Final.
There are no finals for Year 5 or Year 6/7.
The top eight teams in each division according to the Results are eligible to participate in the Quarter Finals.
Finals elimination is conducted on a win-loss basis.
Debating SA will release finals topics at the conclusion of the preliminary rounds.
Sides and oppositions for finals are determined by team rankings, as follows:
Debating SA may alter the above team pairings if there are less than 8 teams eligible to participate in the finals.
Quarter Final debates will be judged by a single adjudicator, Semi Final debates by a panel of 3 adjudicators and Grand Final debates by a panel of 5 adjudicators.
In the event that there is a panel of adjudicators, the winner will be determined by a majority vote of the panel. The decision of each individual adjudicator is secret and the overall decision final.
Individual speaker feedback is not given by adjudicators in Semi Final and Grand Final debates.
Debater of the Year Awards will be held for all divisions to recognise excellence in debating. The Debater of the Year for each division will be decided based on the following criteria:
Debaters must have participated in at least three debates to be eligible for consideration.
In each debate each speaker is ranked relative to the other participants in the debate (usually 1 through 6 in the case of 6 different scores) according to the speaker scores. This ranking is called a Debater of the Year Debate Ranking
Speakers who have participated in the required number of debates will be ranked according to the following (in order):
The average of their best 3 speaker scores.
The average of their best 3 Debater of the Year Debate Rankings.
If two or more speakers are ranked the same under these criteria then the speakers’ positions as at the previous round will be used.
If no distinction between speakers can be drawn according to the above criteria then additional criteria may be applied by Debating SA.
Debating SA believes firmly that each and every participant has the right to participate in a respectful, safe and supportive environment. Therefore, all persons involved in our programme, such as teachers, coaches, parents and other spectators, are required to adhere to the following Code of Conduct:
Members of the audience:
TURN OFF MOBILE PHONES OR OTHER DEVICES SUCH AS ELECTRONIC GAMES. Spectators are asked to behave in a way that is respectful to debaters and models best conduct. The use of electronic devices such as mobile phones or games, or other (non-electronic) items which could potentially cause audible and/or visual distraction to speakers, are not permitted during a debate.
DO NOT SPEAK DURING THE DEBATE. Spectators should refrain from talking (or whispering) while a debate is in session. They must not make any gestures, or noises or otherwise engage in any conduct which could potentially distract a speaker or others. Younger children who wish to attend must also adhere to this requirement otherwise, they should not attend a debate. It may not always be practicable or appropriate for very young children to attend.
DO NOT ENTER THE ROOM WHILE A DEBATER IS SPEAKING. Spectators should only enter or exit a debating room during the short break between speakers if a debate is in session. Entering/exiting audience members should move discreetly and quietly so that the debaters and the adjudicator can focus on their respective tasks without interruption
NO VIDEO RECORDING OR PHOTOS of any proceedings in any debate is permitted except with the express and prior consent of all the individual participants involved and of Debating SA
If an adjudicator believes that an audience member's behaviour is unacceptable, the adjudicator may ask the audience member to leave.
Persistent breaches of these expectations may result in particular individuals being excluded from attending future Debating SA events.
For further information regarding debating please refer to the Official Debating Manual which has a detailed explanation of all the formalities of debating.
Site Map | Site disclaimer and copyright